Difference between revisions of "Composite IPR"

From wiki.pengtools.com
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "__TOC__ == Composite Inflow Performance Relationship== thumb|right|300px|3 Phase IPR Curve <ref name=KermitBrown1984/> 3 Phase IPR calculat...")
 
(Nomenclature)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
 
== Composite Inflow Performance Relationship==
 
== Composite Inflow Performance Relationship==
[[File:3 Phase IPR Curve.png|thumb|right|300px|3 Phase IPR Curve <ref name=KermitBrown1984/>]]
+
[[File:Composite IPR Curve.png|thumb|right|300px|Composite IPR Curve <ref name=KermitBrown1984/>]]
  
[[3 Phase IPR]] calculates [[IPR]] curve for oil wells producing water at various [[WCUT | watercuts]].
+
[[Composite IPR]] calculates [[IPR]] curve for oil wells producing water at various [[WCUT | watercuts]].
  
[[3 Phase IPR]] equation was derived by Petrobras based on combination of [[Vogel's IPR]] equation for oil flow and constant productivity for water flow <ref name=KermitBrown1984/>.
+
[[Composite IPR]] equation was derived by Petrobras based on combination of [[Vogel's IPR]] equation for oil flow and constant productivity for water flow <ref name=KermitBrown1984/>.
  
[[3 Phase IPR]] curve is determined geometrically from those equations considering the fractional flow of oil and water  <ref name=KermitBrown1984/>.
+
[[Composite IPR]] curve is determined geometrically from those equations considering the fractional flow of oil and water  <ref name=KermitBrown1984/>.
  
 
==Math and Physics==
 
==Math and Physics==
Line 41: Line 41:
 
:<math> q_{o_{max}}=q_b+\frac{JP_b}{1.8}</math><ref name=KermitBrown1984/>
 
:<math> q_{o_{max}}=q_b+\frac{JP_b}{1.8}</math><ref name=KermitBrown1984/>
  
==[[3 Phase IPR]] calculation example==
+
==[[Composite IPR]] calculation example==
[[File:3 Phase IPR calculation example.png|thumb|right|400px| Figure.1 [https://www.pengtools.com/pqPlot?paramsToken=73eca3000d5f28d661700c874ebcf1f1 3 Phase IPR calculation example]]]
+
[[File:3 Phase IPR calculation example.png|thumb|right|400px| Figure.1 [https://www.pengtools.com/pqPlot?paramsToken=73eca3000d5f28d661700c874ebcf1f1 Composite IPR calculation example]]]
 
Following the example problem #21, page 33 <ref name=KermitBrown1984 />:
 
Following the example problem #21, page 33 <ref name=KermitBrown1984 />:
 
===Given:===
 
===Given:===
Line 52: Line 52:
  
 
===Calculate:===
 
===Calculate:===
Determine the [[3 Phase IPR]] curves for F<sub>w</sub>=0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.
+
Determine the [[Composite IPR]] curves for F<sub>w</sub>=0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.
 +
 
 
===Solution:===
 
===Solution:===
  
 
The problem was run through [[:Category:PQplot | PQplot]] software for different values of watercut.
 
The problem was run through [[:Category:PQplot | PQplot]] software for different values of watercut.
  
Result [[3 Phase IPR]] curves are shown on '''Fig.1'''. Points indicate results obtained by Brown <ref name=KermitBrown1984 />.
+
Result [[Composite IPR]] curves are shown on '''Fig.1'''. Points indicate results obtained by Brown <ref name=KermitBrown1984 />.
  
The  [[:Category:PQplot|PQplot]] model from this example is available online by the following link: [https://www.pengtools.com/pqPlot?paramsToken=73eca3000d5f28d661700c874ebcf1f1 3 Phase IPR calculation example]
+
The  [[:Category:PQplot|PQplot]] model from this example is available online by the following link: [https://www.pengtools.com/pqPlot?paramsToken=73eca3000d5f28d661700c874ebcf1f1 Composite IPR calculation example]
  
 
== Nomenclature  ==
 
== Nomenclature  ==
Line 65: Line 66:
 
:<math> F_o </math> = oil fraction, fraction
 
:<math> F_o </math> = oil fraction, fraction
 
:<math> F_w </math> = water fraction, fraction
 
:<math> F_w </math> = water fraction, fraction
:<math> J </math> = productivity index, stb/d/psia
+
:<math> J </math> = oil productivity index, stb/d/psia
 
:<math> P </math> = pressure, psia
 
:<math> P </math> = pressure, psia
 
:<math> q </math> = flowing rate, stb/d
 
:<math> q </math> = flowing rate, stb/d
Line 93: Line 94:
 
:[[IPR]]<BR/>
 
:[[IPR]]<BR/>
 
:[[Vogel's IPR]]<BR/>
 
:[[Vogel's IPR]]<BR/>
 +
:[[3 Phase IPR]]<BR/>
 
:[[Darcy's law]]<BR/>
 
:[[Darcy's law]]<BR/>
  
 
{{#seo:
 
{{#seo:
|title=3 Phase IPR curve
+
|title=Composite IPR curve
 
|titlemode= replace
 
|titlemode= replace
 
|keywords=Inflow Performance Relationship, nodal analysis, IPR curve, IPR calculator
 
|keywords=Inflow Performance Relationship, nodal analysis, IPR curve, IPR calculator
|description=Three-phase inflow performance relationship for oil wells producing water.
+
|description= Composite inflow performance relationship for oil wells producing water.
 
}}
 
}}
  
 
[[Category:PQplot]]
 
[[Category:PQplot]]

Latest revision as of 18:45, 13 June 2023

Composite Inflow Performance Relationship

Composite IPR Curve [1]

Composite IPR calculates IPR curve for oil wells producing water at various watercuts.

Composite IPR equation was derived by Petrobras based on combination of Vogel's IPR equation for oil flow and constant productivity for water flow [1].

Composite IPR curve is determined geometrically from those equations considering the fractional flow of oil and water [1].

Math and Physics

Total flow rate equations:

For Pb < Pwf < Pr

For pressures between reservoir pressure and bubble point pressure:

 q_t =J (P_r - P_{wf}) [1]

For PwfG < Pwf < Pb

For pressures between the bubble point pressure and the flowing bottom-hole pressures:

 q_t =\frac{-C+\sqrt{C^2-4B^2D}}{2B^2}\ for B \ne 0[1]
 q_t =D/C\ for B = 0[1]

where:

 A=\frac{P_{wf}+0.125F_oP_b-F_wP_r}{0.125F_oP_b}[1]
 B=\frac{F_w}{0.125F_oP_bJ}[1]
 C=2AB+\frac{80}{q_{o_{max}}-q_b}[1]
 D=A^2-80\frac{q_b}{q_{o_{max}}-q_b}-81[1]

For 0 < Pwf < PwfG

 q_t =\frac{P_{wfG}+q_{o_{max}}tan(\beta)-P_{wf}}{tan(\beta)}[1]

where:

 tan(\beta) = CD/CG [1]
 CD = F_w\frac{0.001q_{o_{max}}}{J}+F_o0.125P_b \left ( -1+\sqrt{81-80 \frac{0.999q_{o_{max}}-q_b}{q_{o_{max}}-q_b}} \right)[1]
 CG = 0.001 q_{o_{max}}[1]

And

 P_{wfG}=F_w \left ( P_r - \frac{q_{o_{max}}}{J}\right )[1]
 q_{o_{max}}=q_b+\frac{JP_b}{1.8}[1]

Composite IPR calculation example

Following the example problem #21, page 33 [1]:

Given:

P_r = 2550 psi
P_b = 2100 psi

Test data:

P_{wf} = 2300 psi
q_t = 500 b/d

Calculate:

Determine the Composite IPR curves for Fw=0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.

Solution:

The problem was run through PQplot software for different values of watercut.

Result Composite IPR curves are shown on Fig.1. Points indicate results obtained by Brown [1].

The PQplot model from this example is available online by the following link: Composite IPR calculation example

Nomenclature

 A, B, C, D, tan(\beta), CD, CG = calculation variables
 F_o = oil fraction, fraction
 F_w = water fraction, fraction
 J = oil productivity index, stb/d/psia
 P = pressure, psia
 q = flowing rate, stb/d

Subscripts

b = at bubble point
max = maximum
o = oil
r = reservoir
t = total
wf = well flowing bottomhole pressure
wfG = well flowing bottomhole pressure at point G

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 Brown, Kermit (1984). The Technology of Artificial Lift Methods. Volume 4. Production Optimization of Oil and Gas Wells by Nodal System Analysis. Tulsa, Oklahoma: PennWellBookss. 

See also

IPR
Vogel's IPR
3 Phase IPR
Darcy's law