Difference between revisions of "3 Phase IPR"
From wiki.pengtools.com
(→3 Phase IPR calculation example) |
(→Given:) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
:<math>P_b</math>=2100 psi | :<math>P_b</math>=2100 psi | ||
Test data: | Test data: | ||
− | :P_{wf}=2300 psi | + | :<math>P_{wf}</math>=2300 psi |
− | :q_t=500 b/d | + | :<math>q_t</math>=500 b/d |
+ | |||
===Calculate:=== | ===Calculate:=== | ||
Determine the [[3 Phase IPR]] curves for F<sub>w</sub>=0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1. | Determine the [[3 Phase IPR]] curves for F<sub>w</sub>=0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1. |
Revision as of 09:16, 11 April 2019
Contents
Three-phase Inflow Performance Relationship
3 Phase IPR calculates IPR curve for oil wells producing water at various watercuts.
3 Phase IPR equation was derived by Petrobras based on combination of Vogel's IPR equation for oil flow and constant productivity for water flow [1].
3 Phase IPR curve is determined geometrically from those equations considering the fractional flow of oil and water [1].
Math and Physics
Total flow rate equations:
For Pb < Pwf < Pr
For pressures between reservoir pressure and bubble point pressure:
For PwfG < Pwf < Pb
For pressures between the bubble point pressure and the flowing bottom-hole pressures:
where:
For 0 < Pwf < PwfG
where:
And
3 Phase IPR calculation example
Following the example problem #21, page 33 [1]:
Given:
- =2550 psi
- =2100 psi
Test data:
- =2300 psi
- =500 b/d
Calculate:
Determine the 3 Phase IPR curves for Fw=0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.
Solution:
Nomenclature
- = calculation variables
- = oil fraction, fraction
- = water fraction, fraction
- = productivity index, stb/d/psia
- = pressure, psia
- = flowing rate, stb/d
Subscripts
- b = at bubble point
- max = maximum
- o = oil
- r = reservoir
- t = total
- wf = well flowing bottomhole pressure
- wfG = well flowing bottomhole pressure at point G