Difference between revisions of "Category: Enhancement List"
(→Workflow) |
(→Workflow) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
GAS - if JD<0.13 JD=0.13 else JD | GAS - if JD<0.13 JD=0.13 else JD | ||
OIL - if JD<1.27 then JD=1.27 else JD | OIL - if JD<1.27 then JD=1.27 else JD | ||
+ | |||
+ | Misha, I think that we need two | ||
+ | potential calculations(columns) | ||
+ | for flowing wells: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. "WHP POTENTIAL" is calculated | ||
+ | by by setting the WHP equal | ||
+ | to the current line pressure at the | ||
+ | well head. Use estimated current | ||
+ | Jd. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. "WO POTENTIAL" is calculated by | ||
+ | using the largest tubing practical | ||
+ | that will fit in the current well bore | ||
+ | with a WHP equal to current line | ||
+ | pressure. Use a Jd ~ 0.13. The | ||
+ | assumption is that we will mitigate | ||
+ | the current skin with better | ||
+ | completion during the workover. | ||
+ | The largest tubing size is | ||
+ | approximately the casing drift | ||
+ | diameter minus the tubing | ||
+ | coupling diameter > 0.75 | ||
+ | Inches for clearance. Then | ||
+ | convert this to the nearest | ||
+ | standard tubing OD, 2 7/8, 3 1/2, | ||
+ | 4, 4 1/2, 5, 5 1/2, 6, 6 5/8, 7, | ||
+ | 7 5/8, etc, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The potential gap should be sorted | ||
+ | based on the "WHP POTENTIAL" | ||
+ | since this is the easiest and cheapest | ||
+ | enhancement to execute. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Your horseshoe should be based | ||
+ | on the "WO POTENTIAL" since this | ||
+ | Is the actual potential of the currently | ||
+ | constructed well bore. | ||
+ | |||
+ | You should always display AOFs | ||
+ | in one of the columns. | ||
+ | |||
+ | These rules apply to all flowing | ||
+ | wells unless the workover installs | ||
+ | artificial lift of some sort. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Artificial lift is a different sheet and | ||
+ | we can spec it later, since it doesn't | ||
+ | apply to us at this time. | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 13 July 2018
Contents
Brief
Enhancement List is a workflow for identifying the performance gaps based on the Gap Analysis.
The workflow produces the Enhancement List which is a ranking of the Enhancements with the best on the top.
Routine execution of the identified Enhancements unlocks the pathway to Production Potential and results in more production, improved recovery and increased earnings.
Workflow
WHP and WOP
WHP POTENTIAL is calculated by by setting the WHP equal to the current FLP.
"WO POTENTIAL" is calculated by using the largest tubing practical that will fit in the current well bore with a WHP equal to current line pressure.
две ветки: flowing (tub, ann, tub+ann) not flowing (или ESP или PCP и тп) две категории: ENHANCED WO ENHANCED по flowing: ENHANCED - так же как в Gas Enh List WO ENHANCED - AOF по not flowing: ENHANCED - считаем BHP при Hd=Htub, считаем ql для этого BHP через IPR WO ENHANCED - AOF для JD при расчете AOF: GAS - if JD<0.13 JD=0.13 else JD OIL - if JD<1.27 then JD=1.27 else JD
Misha, I think that we need two potential calculations(columns) for flowing wells:
1. "WHP POTENTIAL" is calculated
by by setting the WHP equal to the current line pressure at the well head. Use estimated current Jd.
2. "WO POTENTIAL" is calculated by
using the largest tubing practical that will fit in the current well bore with a WHP equal to current line pressure. Use a Jd ~ 0.13. The assumption is that we will mitigate the current skin with better completion during the workover. The largest tubing size is approximately the casing drift diameter minus the tubing coupling diameter > 0.75 Inches for clearance. Then convert this to the nearest standard tubing OD, 2 7/8, 3 1/2, 4, 4 1/2, 5, 5 1/2, 6, 6 5/8, 7, 7 5/8, etc,
The potential gap should be sorted
based on the "WHP POTENTIAL" since this is the easiest and cheapest enhancement to execute.
Your horseshoe should be based
on the "WO POTENTIAL" since this Is the actual potential of the currently constructed well bore.
You should always display AOFs
in one of the columns.
These rules apply to all flowing
wells unless the workover installs artificial lift of some sort.
Artificial lift is a different sheet and we can spec it later, since it doesn't apply to us at this time.
Production Potential is used to rank the Enhancements.
Below is the Production Potential calculation logic of the E&P Portal:
Well Primary Fluid | Well Operating Type | Wellhead Potential (WHP) | Workover Potential (WOP) |
---|---|---|---|
Gas | Flowing | 123 | |
Oil | Flowing | 123 | |
Oil | ESP, Rod Pump, PCP | 123 |
Pages in category "Enhancement List"
The following 5 pages are in this category, out of 5 total.