Difference between revisions of "Dranchuk correlation"

From wiki.pengtools.com
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
=== Math & Physics ===
 
=== Math & Physics ===
 
equation on gas compressibility factor z
 
equation on gas compressibility factor z
    A1 = 0.3265
+
A1 = 0.3265<br/>
    A2 = –1.0700
+
A2 = –1.0700<br/>
    A3 = –0.5339
+
A3 = –0.5339<br/>
    A4 = 0.01569
+
A4 = 0.01569<br/>
    A5 = –0.05165
+
A5 = –0.05165<br/>
    A6 = 0.5475
+
A6 = 0.5475<br/>
    A7 = –0.7361
+
A7 = –0.7361<br/>
    A8 = 0.1844
+
A8 = 0.1844<br/>
    A9 = 0.1056
+
A9 = 0.1056<br/>
    A10 = 0.6134
+
A10 = 0.6134<br/>
    A11 = 0.7210
+
A11 = 0.7210<br/>
 
:<math> z =  1+
 
:<math> z =  1+
 
\left(A_1
 
\left(A_1

Revision as of 10:43, 25 April 2017

Brief

Liquid loading is a phenomenon when the gas phase does't provide sufficient transport energy to lift the liquids out of the well.

In 1969 Turner et al. published an empirical correlation defining the Liquid loading gas velocity.


Math & Physics

equation on gas compressibility factor z A1 = 0.3265
A2 = –1.0700
A3 = –0.5339
A4 = 0.01569
A5 = –0.05165
A6 = 0.5475
A7 = –0.7361
A8 = 0.1844
A9 = 0.1056
A10 = 0.6134
A11 = 0.7210

 z =  1+
\left(A_1
 +\frac{A_2}{T_{pr}}
 +\frac{A_3}{T^3_{pr}}
 +\frac{A_4}{T^4_{pr}}
 +\frac{A_5}{T^5_{pr}}
\right)\  \rho_r+
\left(A_6
 +\frac{A_7}{T_{pr}}
 +\frac{A_8}{T^2_{pr}}
\right)\ \rho^2_r
-A_9\ \left(\frac{A_7}{T_{pr}}+\frac{A_8}{T^2_{pr}}\right)
+A_{10}\ \left(1+A_{11}\ \rho^2_r\right)\ \frac{\rho^2_r}{T^3_{pr}}
\ e^{-A_{11}\ \rho^2_r}
[1]

where

  T_{pc} =  99.3+180\ SG_g-6.94\ SG^2_g
  P_{pc} =  4.6+0.1\ SG_g-0.258\ SG^2_g
  T_{pr} =  \frac{T}{T_{pc}}
  P_{pr} =  \frac{P}{P_{pc}}
  \rho_r = \frac{0.27\ P_{pr}}{({z\ T_{pr}})}

Discussion

To avoid the Liquid loading the gas velocity should be above the Liquid loading velocity.

The higher the gas rate the higher the gas velocity.

The lower the wellhead flowing pressure the higher the gas rate.

The bigger the tubing ID the higher the gas rate.

In case when the gas rate is limited by the Reservoir deliverability smaller tubing ID will increase the gas velocity.

Nomenclature

 A = flow area, ft^2
 P = flowing wellhead pressure, psia
 q_g = gas rate, MMscf/d
 \rho_g = gas density, lbm/ft3
 \rho_L = liquid density, lbm/ft3
 \sigma = surface tension, dyne/cm (ref values: 60 - water, 20 - condensate) [1]
 T = flowing temperature, °R
 v_g = gas velocity, ft/sec
 z = gas compressibility factor at flowing P & T, dimensionless

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Turner, R. G.; Hubbard, A. E.; Dukler (Nov 1969). "Analysis and Prediction of Minimum Flow Rate for the Continuous Removal of Liquids from Gas Wells"Free registration required. Journal of Petroleum Technology (SPE-2198-PA): 1475–1482.