Difference between revisions of "Category: FracDesign"

From wiki.pengtools.com
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Design mode)
(→‎Design mode)
Line 113: Line 113:
 
# Input the fracture height, '''h<sub>f</sub>'''
 
# Input the fracture height, '''h<sub>f</sub>'''
 
# Run [[:category:optiFrac | optiFrac]] to get optimum  '''x<sub>f</sub>''' and '''w<sub>f, prop</sub>'''
 
# Run [[:category:optiFrac | optiFrac]] to get optimum  '''x<sub>f</sub>''' and '''w<sub>f, prop</sub>'''
−
# Depending on fracture geometry calculate maximum and average hydraulic fracture widths : '''w<sub>f,hydr,max</sub>''' and '''w<sub>f,hydr,avg</sub>'''
+
# Calculate maximum and average hydraulic fracture widths : '''w<sub>f,hydr,max</sub>''' and '''w<sub>f,hydr,avg</sub>'''
 +
# Solve mass balance equation for total pumping time, '''t<sub>e</sub>'''
  
 
===Simulation mode===
 
===Simulation mode===

Revision as of 08:22, 12 October 2018

Brief

pengtools fracDesign

fracDesign is a tool for designing a hydraulic fracture treatment in pengtools.

For the given set of reservoir, fluid and proppant properties fracDesign calculates the pumping schedule which will create the optimal fracture geometry to achieve maximum well’s productivity.

fracDesignis available online at www.pengtools.com.

Typical applications

  • Calculating the pumping schedule required to achive optimal fracture geometry
  • Optimization of hydraulic fracture design with Unified Fracture Design[1]
  • Simulation of the fracture geometry based on the given pumping schedule with PKN and KGD models
  • Sensitivity studies

Math & Physics

w_{f,hydr,max,PKN}=9.15^{\frac{1}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ 3.98^{\frac{n}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ \left ( \frac{1+2.14n}{n}\right )^{\frac{n}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ K^{\frac{1}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ \left ( \frac{q_i^n h_f^{1-n} x_f}{E'} \right )^{\frac{1}{(2 + 2 n)}} - hydraulic maximum fracture width PKN (ref[2] eq 9.53)
w_{f,hydr,max,KGD}=11.1^{\frac{1}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ 3.24^{\frac{n}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ \left ( \frac{1+2n}{n}\right )^{\frac{n}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ K^{\frac{1}{(2 + 2 n)}}\ \left ( \frac{q_i^n x_f^2}{h_f^n E'} \right )^{\frac{1}{(2 + 2 n)}} - hydraulic maximum fracture width KGD (ref[2] eq 9.55)
E'=\frac{E}{1-\nu^2} - plain strain modulus
w_{f,hydr,avg} = w_{f,hydr,max} * \gamma - hydraulic average fracture width
\gamma_{PKN}=\frac{\pi}{5} - shape factor PKN (ref[2] eq 9.10)
\gamma_{KGD}=\frac{\pi}{4} - shape factor KGD (ref[2] eq 9.24)
w_{f,prop}=\frac{M_{prop}}{2 x_f h_f (1-\phi_{prop}) \rho_{prop}} - propped fracture width
V_i = V_f + V_L - mass balance equation (ref[2] eq 8.1)
V_i = q_i t_e - injected volume into one fracture wing
A_f = x_f h_f - the area of one face of one wing for rectangular fracture shape
A_f = x_f h_f \frac{\pi}{4} - the area of one face of one wing for elliptic fracture shape
V_f = A_f w_{hydr,avg} - volume of fluid contained in one fracture wing
V_L = K_L 2 A_f C_L \sqrt{t} + 2 A_f S_p - volume of fluid leak-off to formation through the two created fracture surfaces of one wing
q_i t = A_f w_{hydr,avg} + K_L 2 A_f C_L \sqrt{t} + 2 A_f S_p - mass balance equation (ref[1] eq 4.6)
\eta = \frac{V_f}{V_i} - fluid efficiency

Opening time distribution factor KL

Nolte opening time distribution factor KL

2 K_L=\frac{8}{3} \eta + ( 1 - \eta) \pi - (ref[2] eq 8.36)

Carter opening time distribution factor KL

K_L=-\frac{S_p}{C_L \sqrt{t_e}} - \frac{w_{f,hydr,avg}}{2C_L\sqrt{t_e}} + \frac{w_{f,hydr,avg}}{2 \eta C_L \sqrt{t_e}} (ref [1] eq 4.8)

where:

\eta=\frac{w_{f,hydr,avg}(w_{f,hydr,avg}+2S_p)}{4\pi {C_L}^2 t_e} \left ( exp(\beta^2) erfc(\beta) + \frac{2\beta}{\sqrt\pi} - 1 \right )(ref [1] eq 4.9)

and:

\beta=\frac{2C_L \sqrt{\pi t_e}}{w_{f,hydr,avg} + 2S_p}(ref [1] eq 4.9)

Nolte G-function for opening time distribution factor KL

g_0(\alpha)=\frac{2 + 2.06798 \alpha + 0.541262 \alpha^2 + 0.0301598 \alpha^3}{1 + 1.6477 \alpha + 0.738452 \alpha^2 + 0.0919097 \alpha^3 + 0.00149497 \alpha^4}(ref [1] eq 4.12)

where:

\alpha_{PKN} =\frac{2n+2}{2n+3}
\alpha_{KGD} =\frac{n+1}{n+2}

Pumping schedule

According to Nolte[3] the schedule is derived from the following assumptions:

  • the whole length created should be propped
  • at the end of pumping, the proppant distribution in the fracture should be uniform
  • the proppant schedule should be of the form of a delayed power law with the Nolte's exponent and the fraction of pad being equal
\epsilon= \frac{1-\eta}{1+\eta} - Nolte exponent
t_{pad}=\epsilon t_e - pad pumping time
c_e=\frac{M_{prop}}{2\eta V_i} - proppant concentration at the end of pumping
c=c_e \left ( \frac{t-t_{pad}}{t_e-t_{pad}} \right )^{\epsilon} - slurry concentration vs time
dt_{stage}=\frac{t_e - t_{pad}}{N_{stages}} - ramping stage duration
c_{stage} = \frac {\int \limits_{t_{start}}^{t_{end}} c_e \left ( \frac{t-t_{pad}}{t_e-t_{pad}} \right )^{\epsilon} dt}{t_{end}-t_{start}} - ramping stage slurry concentration
c_a=\frac{c}{1-\frac{c}{\rho_{prop}}} - conversion form slurry concentration (proppant mass per unit of injected slurry) to clean concentration (proppant mass per unit of injected clean/base/"neat" fluid)

Flow Diagram

Design mode

FracDesign design mode flow diagram.png

Simulation mode

FracDesign simulation mode flow diagram.png

Workflow

Design mode

  1. Input the fracture height, hf
  2. Run optiFrac to get optimum xf and wf, prop
  3. Calculate maximum and average hydraulic fracture widths : wf,hydr,max and wf,hydr,avg
  4. Solve mass balance equation for total pumping time, te

Simulation mode

Comparison study

Main features

  • PKN and KGD fracture geometry models
  • optiFrac workflow on fracture geometry optimization
  • Slurry concentration versus time pumping schedule as plot and table
  • Fracture length and width profiles vs time plots
  • Net pressure profiles vs time as plot and table
  • Practical pumping constrains and Fracture tuning options
  • Detailed output table with calculated fracture design parameters
  • Sensitivity option with benchmark to potential
  • Simulation mode: calculating the fracture geometry from the given pumping schedule
  • "New model" button resets input values to the default values.
  • Switch between Metric and Field units.
  • Save/load models to the files and to the user’s cloud.
  • Export pdf report containing input parameters, calculated values and the chart.
  • Share models to the public cloud or by using model’s link.
  • Continue your work from where you stopped: last saved model will be automatically opened.
  • Download the chart as an image or data and print (upper-right corner chart’s button).

Nomenclature

w = width, m
n = rheology flow behavior index, dimensionless
K = rheology consistency index, Pa*sn
q = slurry injection rate for one wing, m3/sec
h = height, m
x_f = fracture half-length, m
E = Young's Modulus, Pa
E' = plain strain modulus, Pa
M = mass, kg
V = volume, m3
A = surface area, m2
t = pumping time, sec
dt = time step, sec
K_L = opening time distribution factor, dimensionless
C_L = leak-off coefficient, m/s0.5
S_p = spurt loss coefficient, m
c = slurry concentration (proppant mass per unit of injected slurry), kg/m3
c_a = clean concentration (proppant mass per unit of injected clean/base/"neat" fluid), kg/m3

Greek symbols

\delta = dry to wet width ratio at the end of pumping, usually 0.5-0.7
\gamma = geometric factor in vertical direction, dimensionless
\nu = Poisson's ratio, dimensionless
\phi = porosity, fraction
\pi = 3.1415
\rho = density, kg/m3
\eta = fluid efficiency, fraction
\epsilon = Nolte exponent, dimensionless

Subscripts

e = end of pumping
f = fracture
gross = gross
max = maximum
net = net
prop = propped or proppant
r = reservoir
hydr = hydraulic
prop = propped
PKN = Perkins-Kern-Nordgren geometry
KGD = Khristianovic-Geertsma-de Klerk geometry
avg = average
i = injected
L = leak-off
pad = pad

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Economides, Michael J.; Oligney, Ronald; Valko, Peter (2002). Unified Fracture Design: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. Alvin, Texas: Orsa Press. 
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 Valko, Peter; Economides, Michael J. (1995). Hydraulic fracture mechanics. Texas A & M University: John Wiley and Sons. 
  3. ↑ Nolte, K.G. (1986). "Determination of Proppant and Fluid Schedules From Fracturing-Pressure Decline"Free registration required (SPE-13278-PA). Society of Petroleum Engineers. 
Retrieved from "https://wiki.pengtools.com/index.php?title=Category:FracDesign&oldid=5018"