Hagedorn and Brown correlation

From wiki.pengtools.com
Revision as of 09:44, 23 August 2018 by MishaT (talk | contribs) (Demo)
Jump to: navigation, search

Brief

Hagedorn and Brown is an empirical two-phase flow correlation published in 1965 [1].

It doesn't distinguish between the flow regimes.

The heart of the Hagedorn and Brown method is a correlation for the liquid holdup HL [2].

Hagedorn and Brown is the default VLP correlation for the oil wells in the PQplot.

Hagedorn and Brown in PQplot Vs Prosper & Kappa

Math & Physics

Following the law of conservation of energy the basic steady state flow equation is:

 144 \frac{\Delta p}{\Delta h} = \bar \rho_m + \frac{f q_L^2 M^2}{2.9652 \times 10^{11} D^5 \bar \rho_m} + \bar \rho_m \frac{\Delta{(\frac{v_m^2}{2g_c}})}{\Delta h}[1]

where

 \bar \rho_m = \rho_L H_L + \rho_g (1 - H_L)[1]

Colebrook–White [3] equation for the Darcy's friction factor:

 \frac{1}{\sqrt{f}}= -2 \log \left( \frac { \varepsilon} {3.7 D} + \frac {2.51} {\mathrm{Re} \sqrt{f}} \right)[4]

Reynolds two phase number:

 Re = 2.2 \times 10^{-2} \frac {q_L M}{D \mu_L^{H_L} \mu_g^{(1-H_L)}}[1]

Discussion

Why Hagedorn and Brown?

One of the consistently best correlations ...
— Michael Economides et al[2]

Demo

Watch on youtube

Flow Diagram

HB Block Diagram

Workflow HL

 M =SG_o\ 350.52\ \frac{1}{1+WOR}+SG_w\ 350.52\ \frac{WOR}{1+WOR}+SG_g\ 0.0764\ GLR[1]
 \rho_L= \frac{62.4\ SG_o + \frac{Rs\ 0.0764\ SG_g}{5.614}}{B_o} \frac{1}{1+WOR} + 62.4\ SG_w\ \frac{WOR}{1 + WOR}[5]
 \rho_g = \frac{28.967\ SG_g\ p}{z\ 10.732\ T_R} [5]
 \mu_L = \mu_o \frac{1}{1 + WOR} + \mu_w \frac{WOR}{1 + WOR}[5]
 \sigma_L = \sigma_o \frac{1}{1 + WOR} + \sigma_w \frac{WOR}{1 + WOR}[5]
 N_L = 0.15726\ \mu_L \sqrt[4]{\frac{1}{\rho_L \sigma_L^3}}[1]
 CN_L = 0.061\ N_L^3 - 0.0929\ N_L^2 + 0.0505\ N_L + 0.0019 [2]
 v_{SL} = \frac{5.615 q_L}{86400 A_p} \left ( B_o \frac{1}{1+WOR} + B_w \frac{WOR}{1+WOR} \right )[5]
 v_{SG} = \frac{q_L \left ( GLR-R_s \left( \frac{1}{1+WOR}\right) \right )}{86400 A_p}\ \frac{14.7}{p}\ \frac{T_K}{520}\ \frac{z}{1}[5]
 N_{LV} = 1.938\ v_{SL}\ \sqrt[4]{\frac{\rho_L}{\sigma_L}} [1]
 N_{GV} = 1.938\ v_{SG}\ \sqrt[4]{\frac{\rho_L}{\sigma_L}} [1]
 N_{D} = 120.872\ D \sqrt{\frac{\rho_L}{\sigma_L}} [1]
 H = \frac{N_{LV}}{N_{GV}^{0.575}}\  \left ( \frac{p}{14.7} \right )^{0.1} \frac{CN_L}{N_D} [2]
 \frac{H_L}{\psi} = \sqrt{\frac{0.0047+1123.32 H + 729489.64H^2}{1+1097.1566 H + 722153.97 H^2}} [6]
 B = \frac{N_{GV} N_{LV}^{0.38}}{N_{D}^{2.14}} [2]
 \psi = \begin{cases} 
27170 B^3 - 317.52 B^2 + 0.5472 B + 0.9999,  &\mbox{if } B \le 0.025 \\
-533.33 B^2 + 58.524 B + 0.1171, & \mbox{if }B > 0.025 \\
2.5714 B +1.5962, & \mbox{if }B > 0.055
\end{cases} [6]
 H_L = \frac{H_L}{\psi} \times \psi[1]

Modifications

1. Use the no-slip holdup when the original empirical correlation predicts a liquid holdup HL less than the no-slip holdup [2].

2. Use the Griffith correlation to define the bubble flow regime[2] and calculate HL.

3. Use watercut instead of WOR to account for the watercut = 100%.

Nomenclature

 A_p = flow area, ft2
 B = correlation group, dimensionless
 B = formation factor, bbl/stb
 C = coefficient for liquid viscosity number, dimensionless
 D = pipe diameter, ft
 h = depth, ft
 H = correlation group, dimensionless
 H_L = liquid holdup factor, dimensionless
 f = friction factor, dimensionless
 GLR = gas-liquid ratio, scf/bbl
 M = total mass of oil, water and gas associated with 1 bbl of liquid flowing into and out of the flow string, lbm/bbl
 N_D = pipe diameter number, dimensionless
 N_GV = gas velocity number, dimensionless
 N_L = liquid viscosity number, dimensionless
 N_LV = liquid velocity number, dimensionless
 p = pressure, psia
 q_c = conversion constant equal to 32.174049, lbmft / lbfsec2
 q = total liquid production rate, bbl/d
 Re = Reynolds number, dimensionless
 R_s = solution gas-oil ratio, scf/stb
 SG = specific gravity, dimensionless
 T = temperature, °R or °K, follow the subscript
 v = velocity, ft/sec
 WOR = water-oil ratio, bbl/bbl
 z = gas compressibility factor, dimensionless

Greek symbols

 \varepsilon = absolute roughness, ft
 \mu = viscosity, cp
 \rho = density, lbm/ft3
 \bar \rho = integrated average density at flowing conditions, lbm/ft3
 \sigma = surface tension of liquid-air interface, dynes/cm (ref. values: 72 - water, 35 - oil)
 \psi = secondary correlation factor, dimensionless

Subscripts

g = gas
K = °K
L = liquid
m = gas/liquid mixture
o = oil
R = °R
SL = superficial liquid
SG = superficial gas
w = water

References

  1. Jump up to: 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Hagedorn, A. R.; Brown, K. E. (1965). "Experimental study of pressure gradients occurring during continuous two-phase flow in small-diameter vertical conduits"Free registration required. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 17(04) (SPE-940-PA): 475–484. 
  2. Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Economides, M.J.; Hill, A.D.; Economides, C.E.; Zhu, D. (2013). Petroleum Production Systems (2 ed.). Westford, Massachusetts: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-703158-0. 
  3. Jump up Colebrook, C. F. (1938–1939). "Turbulent Flow in Pipes, With Particular Reference to the Transition Region Between the Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws"Paid subscription required. Journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers. London, England. 11: 133–156. 
  4. Jump up Moody, L. F. (1944). "Friction factors for pipe flow"Paid subscription required. Transactions of the ASME. 66 (8): 671–684. 
  5. Jump up to: 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 Lyons, W.C. (1996). Standard handbook of petroleum and natural gas engineering. 2. Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing. ISBN 0-88415-643-5. 
  6. Jump up to: 6.0 6.1 Trina, S. (2010). An integrated horizontal and vertical flow simulation with application to wax precipitation (Master of Engineering Thesis). Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland.