Hagedorn and Brown correlation

From wiki.pengtools.com
Revision as of 17:09, 24 March 2017 by MishaT (talk | contribs) (Greek symbols)
Jump to: navigation, search

Brief

Hagedorn and Brown is an empirical two-phase flow correlation published in 1965 [1].

It doesn't distinguish between the flow regimes.

The heart of the Hagedorn and Brown method is a correlation for the liquid holdup H_L[2].

Math & Physics

Following the law of conservation of energy the basic steady state flow equation is:

 144 \frac{\Delta p}{\Delta h} = \bar \rho_m + \frac{f q_L^2 M^2}{2.9652 \times 10^{11} D^5 \bar \rho_m} + \bar \rho_m \frac{\Delta{(\frac{v_m^2}{2g_c}})}{\Delta h}[1]

where

 \bar \rho_m = \rho_L H_L + \rho_g (1 - H_L)[1]

Colebrook–White [3] equation for the Darcy's friction factor:

 \frac{1}{\sqrt{f}}= -2 \log \left( \frac { \varepsilon} {3.7 D} + \frac {2.51} {\mathrm{Re} \sqrt{f}} \right)[4]

Reynolds two phase number:

 Re = 2.2 \times 10^{-2} \frac {q_L M}{D \mu_L^{H_L} \mu_g^{(1-H_L)}}[1]

Discussion

Why Hagedorn and Brown?

One of the consistently best correlations ...
— Michael Economides et al[2]
... still one of the most highly regarded models, and its able to predict pressure, flowrate and liquid holdup easily.
— Sameena Trina [5]

Flow Diagram

HB Block Diagram

Workflow

To find H_L calculate:

 M =SG_o\ 350.52\ \frac{1}{1+WOR}+SG_w\ 350.52\ \frac{WOR}{1+WOR}+SG_g\ 0.0764\ GLR[1]
 \rho_L= \frac{62.4\ SG_o + \frac{Rs\ 0.0764\ SG_g}{5.614}}{B_o} \frac{1}{1+WOR} + 62.4\ SG_w\ \frac{WOR}{1 + WOR}[6]
 \rho_g = \frac{28.967\ SG_g\ p}{z\ 10.732\ T_R} [6]
 \mu_L = \mu_o \frac{1}{1 + WOR} + \mu_w \frac{WOR}{1 + WOR}[6]
 \sigma_L = \sigma_o \frac{1}{1 + WOR} + \sigma_w \frac{WOR}{1 + WOR}[6]
 N_L = 0.15726\ \mu_L \sqrt[4]{\frac{1}{\rho_L \sigma_L^3}}[1]
 CN_L = 0.061\ N_L^3 - 0.0929\ N_L^2 + 0.0505\ N_L + 0.0019 [2]
 v_{SL} = \frac{5.615 q_L}{86400 A_p} \left ( B_o \frac{1}{1+WOR} + B_w \frac{WOR}{1+WOR} \right )[6]
 v_{SG} = \frac{q_L \left ( GLR-R_s \left( \frac{1}{1+WOR}\right) \right )}{86400 A_p}\ \frac{14.7}{p}\ \frac{T_K}{520}\ \frac{z}{1}[6]
 N_{LV} = 1.938\ v_{SL}\ \sqrt[4]{\frac{\rho_L}{\sigma_L}} [1]
 N_{GV} = 1.938\ v_{SG}\ \sqrt[4]{\frac{\rho_L}{\sigma_L}} [1]
 N_{D} = 120.872\ D \sqrt{\frac{\rho_L}{\sigma_L}} [1]
 H = \frac{N_{LV}}{N_{GV}^{0.575}}\  \left ( \frac{p}{14.7} \right )^{0.1} \frac{CN_L}{N_D} [2]
 \frac{H_L}{\psi} = \sqrt{\frac{0.0047+1123.32 H + 729489.64H^2}{1+1097.1566 H + 722153.97 H^2}} [5]
 B = \frac{N_{GV} N_{LV}^{0.38}}{N_{D}^{2.14}} [2]
 \psi = \begin{cases} 
27170 B^3 - 317.52 B^2 + 0.5472 B + 0.9999,  &\mbox{if } B <= 0.025 \\
-533.33 B^2 + 58.524 B + 0.1171, & \mbox{if }B > 0.025 \\
2.5714 B +1.5962, & \mbox{if }B > 0.055
\end{cases} [5]
 H_L = \frac{H_L}{\psi} \times \psi[1]

Modifications

1. Use the no-slip holdup when the original empirical correlation predicts a liquid holdup value less than the no-slip holdup [2].

2. Use of the Griffith correlation for the bubble flow regime [2].

3. Use watercut instead of WOR to account for the watercut = 100%.

Nomenclature

 B = correlation group, dimensionless
 B = formation factor, bbl/stb
 C = coefficient for liquid viscosity number, dimensionless
 D = pipe diameter, ft
 h = depth, ft
 H = correlation group, dimensionless
 H_L = liquid holdup factor, dimensionless
 f = friction factor, dimensionless
 GLR = gas-liquid ratio, scf/bbl
 M = total mass of oil, water and gas associated with 1 bbl of liquid flowing into and out of the flow string, lbm/bbl
 N_D = pipe diameter number number, dimensionless
 N_GV = gas velocity number, dimensionless
 N_L = liquid viscosity number, dimensionless
 N_LV = liquid velocity number, dimensionless
 p = pressure, psia
 q_c = conversion constant equal to 32.174, lbmft / lbfsec2
 q_L = total liquid production rate, bbl/d
 Re = Reynolds number, dimensionless
 R_s = solution gas-oil ratio, scf/stb
 SG = specific gravity, dimensionless
 T = temperature, °R or °K, follow the subscript
 v = velocity, ft/sec
 WOR = water-oil ratio, bbl/bbl
 z = gas compressibility factor, dimensionless

Greek symbols

 \varepsilon = absolute roughness, ft
 \mu = oil viscosity, cp
 \rho = density, lbm/ft3
 \bar \rho = integrated average density at flowing conditions, lbm/ft2
 \sigma = surface tension of liquid-air interface, dynes/cm
 \psi = secondary correlation factor, dimensionless

Subscripts

g = gas
K = °K
L = liquid
o = oil
R = °R
SL = superficial liquid
SG = superficial gas
w = water

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 Hagedorn, A. R.; Brown, K. E. (1965). "Experimental study of pressure gradients occurring during continuous two-phase flow in small-diameter vertical conduits". Journal of Petroleum Technology. 17(04): 475–484. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Economides, M.J.; Hill, A.D.; Economides, C.E.; Zhu, D. (2013). Petroleum Production Systems (2 ed.). Westford, Massachusetts: Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-703158-0. 
  3. Colebrook, C. F. (1938–1939). "Turbulent Flow in Pipes, With Particular Reference to the Transition Region Between the Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws"Paid subscription required. Journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers. London, England. 11: 133–156. 
  4. Moody, L. F. (1944). "Friction factors for pipe flow"Paid subscription required. Transactions of the ASME. 66 (8): 671–684. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Trina, S. (2010). An integrated horizontal and vertical flow simulation with application to wax precipitation (Master of Engineering Thesis). Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 Lyons, W.C. (1996). Standard handbook of petroleum and natural gas engineering. 2. Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing. ISBN 0-88415-643-5.