Difference between revisions of "OnPlan Comparison Study 1 Weng"
From wiki.pengtools.com
(→Brief) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The [[OnPlan Comparison Study 1 Weng| case study]] is based on Weng <ref name = Weng /> paper published in 1992. | The [[OnPlan Comparison Study 1 Weng| case study]] is based on Weng <ref name = Weng /> paper published in 1992. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Quote| text = Pseudo 3D (P3D) hydraulic fracturing models often overpredict fracture height for a poorly contained fracture. This is caused partly by either the neglect of the fluid flow component in the vertical direction or a crude treatment of the 2D fluid flow in the fracture as ID flow in the vertical direction in the fracture-height calculation. This paper presents a height-growth model that adopts a flow field more representative of the actual 2D flow in a fracture. | source = Xiaowei Weng<ref name=Weng />}} | ||
==Inputs== | ==Inputs== | ||
Revision as of 08:45, 16 October 2018
Contents
Brief
The case study is based on Weng [1] paper published in 1992.
Pseudo 3D (P3D) hydraulic fracturing models often overpredict fracture height for a poorly contained fracture. This is caused partly by either the neglect of the fluid flow component in the vertical direction or a crude treatment of the 2D fluid flow in the fracture as ID flow in the vertical direction in the fracture-height calculation. This paper presents a height-growth model that adopts a flow field more representative of the actual 2D flow in a fracture.— Xiaowei Weng[1]
Inputs
Results
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Weng, Xiaowei (1992). "Incorporation of 2D Fluid Flow Into a Pseudo-3D Hydraulic Fracturing Simulator" (SPE-21849-PA). Society of Petroleum Engineers.
